top of page

School Newspaper Editorial and Ethics Policies

Dunellen High School

(Modified from Highlands High School and Bernards High School)

School Newspaper Editorial and Ethics Policies

2018-2019

I. General Purposes, Mission Policies

The purpose of the school newspaper is to inform and entertain our audience, which includes the student body, faculty, the local community, and other schools’ journalism programs, on subjects that may affect readers. The newspaper also aims to be a forum for the voices of the audience to be heard.

Finally, the newspaper serves as a hands-on learning tool for the staff as they have the responsibility of putting out this information in a clear, meaningful and journalistic way.

The decision-making process of content in the newspaper is left up to the student staff with the final decision left to the advisers. Although the staff is open to talking with the administration about story ideas, the final consent of the decision-making process lies with the duly appointed editor-in-chief and the appointed editorial board.

The editorial board is the decision-making group for the newspaper staff. It includes the editor-in-chief, business/advertising editors, photography editor, and section editors, but attendance at the meetings is open to all staff members and members of the administration. Meetings will be twice a week, but the advisers or the editor-in-chief can also call them if there are special needs. The board is in charge of making the decisions on what will go into the newspaper, and a majority vote determines those decisions. The adviser is there not to vote, but to help give comments and concerns to the staff members prior to the voting. If a controversial issue arises, it will be voted on in the same manner, but it is the common assumption that there will be nothing published in the newspaper that is libelous, obscene to minors, advocates illegal activities, is copyrighted, or may cause substantial disruption to the school.

 

 

II. Publishing

The Argus is published by Dunellen High School, a public institution. Student journalists are responsible for providing original content for the online version. The school provides some funding, but it is up to the staff to raise money for productions through the sale of advertising and funding-raising events. (This will be discussed in future years)

III. Advertising

The Argus reserves the right to refuse advertising that the staff determines is false or misleading to the student body. No ads will be printed that promote products or services that do not meet community standards for good taste or that are illegal to the majority of the student audience.

Advertisements that appear in the publication are not necessarily endorsed by the publication.

IV. News

The Argus is committed to balanced and impartial news coverage. The reporters attempt to represent all the sides of issues, even if they are controversial, in a fair, honest manner, avoiding exploitation and sensationalism. Emphasis is on issues related to the school, district and local issues, but state, national, and international topics may be covered, if appropriate, and with a local angle.

V. First Amendment Policies
The Argus recognizes that it is a student newspaper and hereby concedes that the administration of the Dunellen School District may reserve that right to review, edit, or, in extreme cases, pull articles or opinion pieces that the administration feels would 1) be a threat to the District’s well-being or 2) would endanger the reputation of students or faculty members.
However, The Argus does assert that it is a legitimate newspaper and that it is guaranteed First Amendment protection from undue censorship that may result for any reason not listed above or later agreed up by the current Board of Editors and the administration.
VI. Editorials and Opinions

The Argus provides a public forum for free speech for students, staff members and others in the school community to voice opinions and concerns. The Constitutional right of free speech includes both the freedom and responsibility to discuss, question, challenge the institution, and the right to express unpopular opinions. An editorial will appear in each issue on the opinion page, and the editor-in-chief will write the article or assign the writer for the staff editorial. The discussion of the content will be by the editorial board, and those who do not agree may write dissenting staff opinions if appropriate.

The staff editorial will be bylined as will all other articles in the newspaper. The stance of editorials requires the consensus of the editorial board. Opinion pieces by the individuals identify the author.

VII. Questions to the Staff

The newspaper staff welcomes anonymous questions from students, faculty, and community members as they give a constructive way for more people to express their opinions, criticisms, and reactions to various issues.

The writer must sign the letter with a pen name. All questions must be school appropriate, or they will be disposed of immediately. If a question has more than two people represented in the writing, there will be a main author credited with a byline for the supporters. The questions must be 250 words or less, and can be edited for grammar and content if necessary by the staff as long as the changes do not affect the meaning of the letter. Question writers should be aware and make sure they understand this before publication. Due to limitations of space, the staff cannot guarantee that all questions will be published, but the staff will do its best to cover all topics fully.

The questions to the staff can be placed in the adviser’s mailbox in the main office(Pair or Lubisco).

VlII. Limitations

The Argus will not print material that is libelous, obscene, indecent, profane, invades privacy, or disrupts the school process.

Libel is defined as a) a false publication in writing, printing, or typewriting, or in signs or pictures that maliciously damage a person’s reputation. b) the act of presenting such a statement to the public.

The Supreme Court has established that to be obscene, material must meet a three-pronged test: (1)An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and (3) The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The FCC has defined profanity as “including language so grossly offensive to members of the public who actually hear it as to amount to a nuisance.”

The FCC has defined broadcast indecency as “language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities.” Indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory material that does not rise to the level of obscenity. The courts have held that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. It may, however, be restricted in order to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.

Invasion of privacy deals with the individual’s right to protect him/herself against the improper use of his/her name in the media. Those who become involved in public events do not easily retain the right to privacy. The Argus will exercise care not to place an individual in a false position.

Disruption of the school process means the deliberate advocacy of interfering with the regular events of school. The Argus will not publish material which, taken as a whole, only appeals to interest in sex, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

We will also be following the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics at all times during the publication process.

bottom of page